This is an awe-inspiring Webcam for use with Skype(I be inflicted with not used it with other Video Discussion Software).The new mount is better than the C910(Not with the intention of I had a conundrum with with the intention of one anyhow). It now has a support mount. I found it works very water supply on a 25" LCD Watch, Mainframe and a 42" rear Projection TV.Bandwidth treatment Information(tested on Skype 5.8 with an i5-2500K Desktop and Lenovo T410 i5 Vpro mainframe with 1Gb/s Lan connectivity)1980 by 1080 by 30 FPS damaged out out at in this area 8Mb/s (C920 on Desktop and C920 on mainframe)1280 by 720 by 30 FPS damaged out out at in this area 3-4Mb/s640 by 480 by 30 FPS damaged out out at in this area 1.4Mb/s(I also got this treatment as difficult a STD mainframe camera on a Lenovo T410)The C920 does look to use a lot a reduced amount of CPU than the C910. 640 by 480 on a basic 2 Duo HP mainframe was up to 80% CPU. With the 920C this dropped to 45% at 1280 by 920 by 30FPS.I also found with the intention of 640 by 480 utilises VP80(or VP60 in diplomacy versions of Skype). It changes to H.264 for 720P and 1080P.The C920 hardware H.264 encoding does not look to be supported on Skype for Linux 2.2.Annotation HD/HQ Skype access requires the latest software (Skype and Webcam drivers), dual basic or privileged CPUs, a supported camera and bandwidth. Skype will ramp up to HD/HQ if the before is pleased and their is void bandwidth AND CPU. It can pocket 2-5 outline to ramp up to 1080P flush on a community 1Gb/s LAN. Also, Skype will NOT ramp up to HD/HQ speeds except the Camera is supported at these speeds.
- J. Hawkes
This webcam is a must be inflicted including for any companionship looking for a splendid deprivation commanding record discussion choice. We were competent to use this to webcam an full discussion opportunity of broadcast to a diffident house and it worked outstanding. We use the microphone built into the webcam and it elected up the broadcast in the in trade of the opportunity. Depiction elected up all in the discussion opportunity, outstanding job Logitech, this worked (and soothe facility) splendid!
- jschwarz3265
I do not enter many reviews, but felt that I must enter one as regards by the C920 on a Mac. I took it out of the box, plugged it into my Mac Pro, positioned it on top of my mind, and launched FaceTime. It worked. I launched Photo Booth, and it worked. I launched Skype, and it worked. The assumed role is incredibly astute and the audio facility perfectly. I'm not sure what else you may want to use this camera for, but as far as I can tell it facility just fine with the Mac OS X applications. In fact, it worked at once and lacking fault.
- Just Noting
Coat grain is extremely obvious on this webcam. Flush in a water supply lit room, you can see the grains compared to the C910. Also, the focusing on this camera is worse than in the C910. On the C910, my room total room would appear bracing and in focus.Mic soothe picks up too greatly shared class blast. The C910 wasn't any better in this watch. Disappointing including the intention of this isn't fixed on the C920 by at smallest amount rising the resistance a little or have it made in software.It has occur to my concentration (from observations below) including the intention of this webcam in detail has a 3 megapixel feeler and Logitech gets its 15 megapixels by using software! Including the intention of explains the worse image feature.Pros: The C920 has a ordinary support mount. This is helpful for mounting to mini-tripods including the intention of can be positioned everyplace on your desk. On infiltrate record encoder earnings it will lower CPU treatment (but soothe wasn't ample to use on G+ Hangouts including anymore broadcast in the room than including the C910 on a mainframe running including AMD C-50, 2GB ram)Cons: Worse image feature than the C910. This might be due to the detail including the intention of it uses a 3 MP feeler versus the 5 MP on the C910. Tests were made subjectively in Skype, Google Hangouts, and from recorded record via Logitech's own software at 720P and 1080P. Running on an AMD 965 BE four-sided figure basic 3.4 Ghz, 4 GB Ram, Windows 7 64 Bit. Honestly, its tricky to caution if there's any CPU reduction on a desktop like mine since it doesn't tax my logic ample.
- MicroP.
Even with what the manufactured goods description states, just want to let all other Mac owners know that this webcam does work with OSX. Plugged in the webcam into a free USB port and it showed up as a selectable choice in the dropdown list of my webcam software - I use ooVoo, have not tried any other software such as Skype, etc. but probability are that it will work just fine.Even if I have not incorrigible it for myself, but is the likely circumstances, the included Logitech software is probably for "add-in" functionality such as avatars, overlays, etc that can be used while using the webcam. There is no driver to bed in on OSX for this webcam to run, it is functional out of the box. Even if, I have not checked whether there are certain resolutions which are not supported because of a lack of point Logitech software or drivers for Mac.One business I did note on my MBA (13" / 128GB SSD / Core i5 / 4GB RAM / Lion) is that the fan does turn on when using this webcam vs not when using the built-in iSight camera. Hope this helps all of you Mac owners wondering if you must by this cam.
- P. Look
Part:: 5:08 MinsThis is an amazing webcam apart early pro the software and Mic which are terrible. Mind my assess pro fine points. Logitech HD Pro Webcam C920, 1080p Widescreen Record Mission and Recording (960-000764)Have a discussion to me Giovanni@rightclickgadget.com
- Giovanni Paredes "Strangeways"
Part:: 1:19 MinsI think my video is self explanatory. Those are the results a complete amateur who has never used a web cam before can get surrounded by 2 synopsis of plugging the cam in.It sits nicely on top of my computer watch and is easy to chat. It's good in low light. It's good in high noise environments. It captures detail. It auto focuses on your face. This is in the end logitech's flagship cam as of 2012. I read a lot of reviews. I wasn't sure I wanted to shell out the cash but I wanted the best. And if the best is $100, I figured I didn't have much to loose. I also own a logitech making a bet keyboard and making a bet mouse and 3.1 speakers, all of which have lasted me 5+ years each. Their harvest are all built to last.I don't see how anyone could use one that doesn't auto-focus.
- Max Power "Max Power"
I was competent to do a supervise over side-by-side evaluation between three Logitech webcams: the C920, C615, and C525. At this calculate is what I establish:Aptly away I noticed including the intention of the C920 was a superior product - as it must be, considering it is Logitech's flagship webcam at the moment. Keep for my initial impression was including the intention of the superfluous facial appearance force not be value the mass and complex tradeoff. Here are three equipment including the intention of the C920 does not be inflicted including:1) Even as all three models glue to your pad monitor in in this vicinity the same road and all three can roll up and not effective, release the C525 and C615 can curve side to side. In detail, they can curve almost 360 degrees and extra. The C920, however, has a threaded support mount, as does the C615.2) The C920 lacks the exceptional "fold-and-go" top of the other two models, which makes packing and travelling easy, even as protecting the lenses. In contrast, the C920 is much better and stationary.3) The C615 comes including a shorter USB cable AND an additional opportunity for extra versatility. The C920 - be fond of the C525 - comes including release a full part cable (~6'). My fancy for all three models is including the intention of they recommend itself including a break USB cable, which would get on to them all much extra portable and easy to reside in almost, especially in this get on to grown-up as most people journey including at nominal amount lone or two USB cables.Keep for as I in detail sat not effective to do some serious comparisons, I realized only how much extra advanced the C920 is, most notably in its aid of H.264 compression and its autofocus conspire.H.264 is a ordinary being utilized extra and extra for video of all sorts, and it makes a enormous difference at this calculate. Having used all three webcams on the same pad and including the same software, the C920 compresses 1080p video absolutely even as recording and takes in this vicinity 49MB per 1 little of recording on the peak settings (720p for lone little takes in this vicinity 31MB). Including the intention of uses *.mp4 plan.Meanwhile, the C615 and C525 aid *.wmv plan and take 99MB and 44MB for lone little of video at 1080p and 720p, respectively. The genuine conundrum, though, is including the intention of you then be inflicted including to sit down and pass the time for the video to compress if you are effective in 1080.If you're attracted, The C920 has 1 zoom level at 1080 and 4 levels at 720. The C615 has 0 zoom levels at 1080 and in this vicinity 10 at 720. The C525 has in this vicinity 10 at 720. All can be used all through recording, keep for the feature involved including the C920 is over again far superior.Also, the autofocus is much better on the C920, including less shining and fit alight change. You can really get on to up accurate and trade show bitter your pores and beard advance.In close, the optics and hardware of the C920 are observably superior to the others, which are by now high feature. If I am using the webcam even as vastly mobile, then I could opt for lone of the others - I force flush only descend for the C525 because it's a tiny piece less important than the C615 and I reconcile you cannot aid the C615 to get on to 1080p video mission, flush if your lodge's Internet benefit could maybe keep up including the figures rank. However, if I am using a webcam at a stationary pad, or am really a videophile, then I beyond disbelief aspire the bigger workhorse.
- MussSyke
UPDATE December 2013: I indifferent my video because it frequently showed the avatars and according to approximately comments Logitech has done gone with the Avatars just. However here is a way almost this by installing the grown-up software and not doing any updates. I be inflicted with not tried it with Windows 8, but it worked with Windows XP and 7. The webcam has gone drastically down in fee, possibly it is because they schooling on appearance out with a newer translation. Dredge up if you don't be fond of it, or it does not come across your exceptions - restore in trade to Amazon. It does not state in this area the Avatars I noticed in the description, but it is still one heck of an awe-inspiring camera for the asking fee! I just desire Logitech brings in trade the fun facial material with their new updates or releases.Here is the first translation of the software for the C910 V2.1. Early this tell pick "lws210_full.exe" early the catalog and do not do any upgrades.ftp://ftp.logitech.com/pub/techsupport/quickcam/ORIGINAL REVIEW FEBRUARY 2102:I be inflicted with to declare I was delighted to pocket see of with the intention of Logitech had occur out with a newer translation of C910. I may possibly not wait to try it and placement a assess. I knew this assess would not compare to the video assess I did for the C910 in check over of the fact with the intention of here was no way my dogs were inane to occur in on "my" own stipulations. If you be inflicted with no clue what I am talking in this area you need to see the video for physically at this tell: Logitech HD Pro Webcam C910. As I did the video assess for the C910 I just talked in this area the depiction, lighting and signal feature. Sweet greatly all of with the intention of stayed the constant with a few enhancements.I understand with the intention of with calculate you need to upgrade and get on to improvements, but I sought after to understand and "analyze" the changes Logitech through with the C920. At the initiation thing I noticed was with the intention of the C920 is practically smaller in mass. I wondered if the mass alteration would interfere with the dimension of the image with the intention of is captured or the feature of the signal because housing almost the lens and speakers is smaller and extra condensed. To my surprise, the depiction and signal looked and sounded splendid. I was pleased it has a 6-foot lingering cable - splendid for a desktop notebook, not so splendid for laptops. The cord is in detail a foot longer than the C910. The camera sits perfectly on my 23-creep screen. The C920 has a "new" tab located bottom the front of the webcam. This allows the camera to sit extra steadily in house without nerve-racking it will reduction backwards or slide forwards A additional splendid figure the C910 did not be inflicted with is with the intention of it is support mountable.The C920 has 15 MP compared to 10MP on the C910. Let's have a discussion in this area mega pixels a modest bit. The pledge of a depiction/image is represented by its mega pixels aka MP. The privileged MP the better you are competent to check over or photograph an image. Typically an 8MP pledge allows you to get on to an 8x11 photo feature photograph. If you try to get on to it large, your image feature will initiation to get of poorer quality and be converted into hazy. In all-function smaller MP are splendid for Internet postings because most of the calculate you crop and check over cinema to get on to them flush smaller. So how important is with the intention of the C920 is 15MP compared to 10MP? I estimate it depends on what you are by it for. If you need to placement or photograph a 15x20 or better depiction than 15MP will be splendid for you. This is not important to me in check over of the fact with the intention of I do not use the webcam to photograph out or placement HUGE cinema. The only cinema I might placement by the webcam are silly looking "duck visage" cinema on shared sites. If I need to pocket photos, I will just use my digital camera. This webcam is primarily used to video chat with friends and my family.Delight be attentive in diplomacy to get 15MP feature cinema you must use the enhanced software Photo Capture which is built-in in the download - just be fond of it is with the C910.Now lets have a discussion in this area Full HD 1080p with H.264. I be inflicted with heard of 1080p but what is H.264? I did approximately investigate. Here are three uncommon types of distinguished classification modes: 720p, 1080i and 1080p. The 1080p is the only full HD. It is competent to spectacle a native pledge of a least 1080 affect, the privileged the number of affect the sharper the image. The "p" means with the intention of the screen spectacle images very promptly by absolutely refreshing the screen with every form. This allows instant movements to spectacle in astute top. Now let me yield reasons for H.264. The H.264 is most excellent renowned as being the codec values for Blu-ray discs. It is widely used by video streaming sources such as YouTube, Vivmeo, iTunes, Amazon and web software such as Adobe Enthusiasm Player and Apple QuickTime. So what does this all norm - it allows you to be viewed in 1080p in a clearer, nearer, smoother and distinguished classification (as lingering as the "viewer" has good feature gear as water supply). The C920 does video dispensation in the webcam as different to the C910 by the notebook's surrounded by dispensation element. This means a reduced amount of jacket and hesitation on your logic in check over of the fact with the intention of all is inane on in the webcam - with the intention of makes a very big alteration in framerates in HD feature.Installation was austere. I am by it in a Windows 7 Family Journal 64-bit OS background. This webcam does NOT occur with an installation CD. You must go to Logitech's website and download the software. The web pocket up can be found in the instructional booklet. It only took a reduced amount of than 1 minute to download the file and in this area 2 outline to install the software. The webcam was up and in succession in a reduced amount of than 3 outline!The image is clear and the passage and rejoinder calculate is at approximately calculate ago and charming. Signal is heard loud and clear. It comes with all the extras the C910 comes with such as shift detection, pause on me, visage recollection, avatar, video mask facial appearance, RightLight, but this calculate the C920 comes with RightLight2 and RightSound. Sadly the video equipment are still not void for Mac OS.2-time limited warranty.By and large - huge upgrade early the C910. EXTREMELY straightforward to use. I be inflicted with everlastingly thorough Logitech a trusty strain I may possibly endlessly entrust and rely on. :-)
- Zulma Johnson
I've been difficult and using the Logitech C920 for a week now. This is really a nice little camera! It takes good, sharp video, and the Logitech Webcam Software (LWS), works fine, though a bit limited in settings.For those wanting approximately tech specs, I ran a bunch of tests and analyzed the records with MediaInfo.LWS provides 4 modes: 360p (640x360 WMV), 480p (864x480 WMV), 720p (1280x720 MP4/AVC), and 1080p (1920x1080 MP4/AVC).In "Preferences," under the "Quick Capture" tab, it provides 3 audio and 3 video quality settings:Audio:Good (16) -- 16kHz at 20kbps (mushy)Better (32) -- 32kHz at 48kbps (fine for voice)Best (48) -- 48kHz at 191kbps (DVD quality)-- These only matter at 360p and 480p.-- In the higher modes, the audio (AAC) is always 48kHz at 99kbps (vbr), no matter where you set the audio quality setting (bug?).kbps and frame rates : ( 360p WMV / 480p WMV / 720p MP4-AVC / 1080p MP4-AVC )Standard (small file): 549 at 15 / 1155 at 15 / 2000 at 30 / 3000 at 30High Q (medium file): 943 at 15 / 2848 at 15 / 3000 at 30 / 4000 at 30Lossless (large file): 1723 at 15 / 3848 at 15 / 4000 at 30 / 6000 at 30-- In 360 and 480, the video bit rate will vary quite a bit depending on the amount of motion in the video. Frame rate is constant at 15.-- In 720 and 1080, the bit rate is constant, and the frame rate is constant at 30, tho MediaInfo now and again shows it as variable.So you can see the highest quality mode is 1080p at 6000kbps at 30fps, which is probably what you wanna use if you're gonna pull it into an editor, and then spit out the results at say, 2000, which makes a good quality video at a reasonable file size for uploading to YT, etc.I don't know what they mean by "lossless," because what the software calls "lossless" is a mere 4-6 Mbps, highly compressed by the camera. But it's more than good enough.For the two AVC modes, the camera is putting out profile Baseline @ L4.0, no CABAC, 1 Reference Frame, CBR, and CFR. The color develop is YUV 4:2:0, 8-bits, Progressive, as probable. This profile is widely compatible with many consumer HD video devices and software players.If you're gonna simply downsample the bitrate with Handbrake, you must make a profile that matches what the hardware in the camera puts out. Make your Handbrake (v0.9.6+) profile like this: -f mp4 -O --crop 0:0:0:0 --strict-anamorphic -e x264 -b 1500 --vfr -a 1 -E copy:aac -B 0 -6 auto -R Auto -D 0 --gain=0 --audio-copy-mask none -x bframes=0:8x8dct=0:cabac=0:weightp=0:ref=4:psy-rd=1.00,0.15 --verbose=1 (where -b = bitrate and -E copy:aac = audio pass-through). Note that I set RefFrames to 4, as it falls back to L3.1 if the ref is left at 1.What about other video resolutions and modes? Running other capture software, like BB Flashback or AVS Video Recorder, you can pick of the litter all resolutions from 160x90 to 2304x1536 (at 2 fps) and the C920 will switch to any of them -- so, yes, it will do all the 4:3 modes like 640x480, but not with LWS. There's no reason they couldn't put approximately common 4:3 modes in it, because the camera will do'em all, and large-screen isn't always desirable.Does the camera put out raw video in the non-AVC modes, like a fixed webcam? In LWS my processor (dual 3.06GHz) runs about 25% capturing 1080p, but about 45% capturing 480p. In other capture software, capturing 1080p in mjpeg or mpeg2/xvid maxes out the processor and stutters badly. So it would appear that the camera's hardware compression only kicks in with 720p and 1080p AVC, and a good thing it does! My computer (and its USB2) won't handle raw 1080p/30 video.Snapshots, using LWS (all JPG, Q unknown and not settable):Low: 1920x1080 (2MP, 472kB), a bit blurry in the detailsMed: 2304x1536 (3MP, 649kB), the native resolution of the image sensorLrg: 3280x1845 (6MP, 1047kB), interpolatedMax: 5168x2907 (15MP, 1984kB), interpolated-- I can see no detail difference in medium, large, and max, so interpolation is useless (as probable).-- I took the sharpest snapshot at 2304x1536 (its native res.) in another capture program that will save a BMP (uncompressed). Indeed, I took that and up-scaled it to 15MP in IrfanView, then saved it as 80% jpeg, and it's half the file size and better quality than what LWSs "Max" setting provided. IrfanView took the 45 meg BMP down to a 1 meg JPG (at 80% Q) and I can't see any difference in details.Now for the little complaints: None for the camera, but the LWS software could use approximately 4:3 resolutions and finer-grained controls, like setting the bit-rate of the audio and tweaking approximately AVC profile settings, more video containers like AVI and MOV, and an uncompressed (BMP) option for snapshots.RightLight: Doesn't seem to do anything. Either the Exposure and Gain are in Auto or not, and you have to uncheck RightLight to uncheck Auto. In auto, the exposure slider usually stays at 9 (of 14) clicks, and the gain varies. Fast motion is nice and smooth, though blurry. With ample lighting, you can improve the video a little by going to manual and putting the exposure at about 5 clicks and then up the gain for a normal picture, and there will be much less motion blur, just like setting a faster exposure on any camera.I found one little bug in LWS: When you put the Gain in manual, it will slowly creep down, about 1% per second. It's annoying.Auto White Balance: Makes you look cold and dead. Set your lights, hold a white card about a foot in front of it, then turn rancid AWB, and you'll look about aptly. Also, reducing the Color Intensity a bit makes faces look more untreated. YMMV, so don't be afraid to put it all in manual and set it just aptly for your lighting. And dredge up, no "auto" material will completely fix every lighting situation. I'm using a 45-watt, 5500K, CRI-91 full-spectrum Alzo CFL, and still call for manual tweaking.RightSound: A simple auto-volume that cuts the volume to about half if you get too loud. Seems to take about 1-2 seconds to respond. LWS has no VU bars or mic test, so you have to run something else to see what it's doing. There is a mic level slider in Preferences and I found it to be too loud at the default median-point; putting it at about 35% made the audio better. There are no audio equalization settings, and it's just a bit "boomy" for my ears. A simple bass and treble filter would be nice.Stereo: If you're aptly in front of the camera, it sounds mono, but if you move around, you sure can hear the difference! But the software must have a mono setting, for those times when it's pointed at something besides your face (like, your hobby on the table), and you're discussion beside the camera.Autofocus: The range is from about 1.4 to 14 inches, and everything beyond that is infinity. To get it to macro-focus, you have to move in slowly, and the object wants approximately detail, or it just loses it and goes back to infinity. Better turning it rancid and setting manually for the task at hand. But if you're discussion within the 14 inches, the AF tracks pretty well and is reasonably fast.Face following: Because it's just moving the image around on the sensor, you have to be zoomed in approximately for it to work, and it only works in 360 and 480 modes. At most, it only "follows" for a few degrees of slant.Didn't try any of the "Effects" -- not my cup of tea. You cannot use them at 720 and 1080, only 360 and 480. Didn't try video phone or chat, so can't comment on that.Overall, I'm very impressed with the C920, and happy I made the purchase. And glad I didn't get the C910, because my computer won't handle raw 1080p.--kv5r
- Harold Melton "KV5R"
Logitech HD Pro Webcam C920, 1080p Widescreen Video Calling and Recording
Full featured webcam featuring H.264 video compression, 1080P HD video recording. 2 year top bolt from the blue hardware warranty
No comments:
Post a Comment